보고 • Board Game Arena

모든 보고

윙스팬 보고

#119181: "Sets of eggs miscalculated. Blue player had 2 sets but was given points for 4."

notabug: 버그가 아닙니다

무엇에 대한 보고입니까?

윙스팬 #493478961

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

규칙: 게임 내 규칙이 적용되지 않았습니다

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

규칙: 게임 내 규칙이 적용되지 않았습니다

같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요

그렇다면, 이 보고를 추천해주세요. 추천을 가장 많이 받은 보고부터 우선적으로 처리됩니다!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

상세한 설명

보고 이력

2024년 Mar 30일 01:22 • EaseHeaten • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

Refreshed page but bug remained

2024년 Mar 30일 01:55 • greenjacket124 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

For some reason, the blue player has an egg in the wetland row that's not on an egg. That seems the most likely source of the issue.

2024년 Mar 31일 20:23 • EaseHeaten • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

Watched preplay and at move 197 (end of round 3) the board shows blue player awareded points for four sets of eggs, which is impossible because:
1. Blue would only be able to get a maximum of 2 sets from his first column, due to Peregrine Falcon (2 egg capacity);
2. No card played in forest row 2, meaning no sets of eggs in row 2 or beyond, meaning Blue player should only have received points for 2 sets of eggs instead of 4.

2024년 Aug 26일 06:31 • Anyannka • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

I had the same issue where in table Wingspan #554609029 purple had 7 points for 7 sets of eggs, however they only had 2 sets of eggs by the end of the game, which should have resulted in much fewer points. Please see move #233 you can see they laid 4 eggs and the final situation. Yet they were awarded for 7 rows for some reson. Please fix this
screenshot of the situation:
imgur.com/a/qrejvTP

2024년 Nov 3일 02:18 • toranagaBS • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

My sets of eggs (round 4) were ignored.

2024년 Nov 15일 18:00 • Mantsa • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

Table ID 589325585
My sets of eggs were ignored, should have gotten 5 points.

2024년 Nov 22일 23:56 • API21 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

Même constat : le calcul des séries d'œufs est erroné. Une série d'œufs est une colonne complète avec un oiseau dans chaque habitat (forêt, plaine et eau) ayant au moins un œuf sur chaque oiseau. Or dans la partie jouée, c'est le nombre d'œufs qui a été pris en compte à partir du moment où au moins une colonne complète avait été posée. Le score final a donné 3 joueurs ex aequo alors que j'étais la seule à avoir 2 séries complètes, les autres joueurs n'ayant pas fini leur 2ème colonne.

2024년 Nov 23일 00:16 • API21 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

Voici la référence de la Table #586402161

2025년 May 12일 13:31 • thebeccia • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

Tavolo #672011732 same error. in the third round i had 4 sets of eggs, counted zero. my opponent had zero, counted 4

2025년 Jul 3일 18:16 • megsb2022 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

I also have this problem. The bonus shows my opponent has 3 sets and I have 1. I have screen shots to show we both have 2 sets of 3

2025년 Jul 3일 18:17 • megsb2022 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

imgur.com/a/NCkD2ZI

2025년 Jul 26일 16:31 • SicutInCaelo • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

F5 did not solve the problem. My egg set count didn't seem to register at all during the round (I was always showing zero even when I had one and then again when I had three at the end of the round.

2025년 Aug 29일 12:34 • ollyfish2002 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

same for me in this game
boardgamearena.com/4/wingspan?table=722104169&replayLastTurn=1&replayLastTurnPlayer=83903889

2025년 Sep 23일 00:41 • Mathew5000 • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

After reading through the reports on this page, I believe that the people contributing here are mistaken. In my opinion this should be marked "not a bug".

You can read the explanation for sets of eggs in the Wingspan rulebook appendix: snipboard.io/kdDXQ1.jpg "For this goal you're only counting the eggs in each habitat. It does not matter on which bird or columns the eggs are placed."

Equivalently, your number of sets of eggs can be defined as the number of eggs in your habitat with the fewest eggs (credit: www.reddit.com/r/wingspan/comments/s3tbwe/comment/hsmq0sx/ )

Just to take one player's report above, Thebeccia writes: "Tavolo #672011732 same error. in the third round i had 4 sets of eggs, counted zero. my opponent had zero, counted 4" But that is apparently based on the misapprehension that a set of eggs means three eggs on one bird. I looked at the replay in question boardgamearena.com/gamereview?table=672011732 and when I jumped ahead to move #189 I can see that Thebeccia (Red) has 0 eggs in wetlands and so is correctly scored with 0 sets of eggs. Green has 4 or more eggs in each habitat, and therefore is correctly scored with 4 sets of eggs; Orange has 3 eggs in forest, 7 in grasslands, and 3 in wetlands, and therefore is correctly scored with 3 sets of eggs.

2025년 Sep 23일 01:06 • paramesis • 버그가 아닙니다:

Matthew5000 is correct. This is NOT A BUG. Thank you so much for looking at the individual reports. This is a very common rules misunderstanding that will always show up as a bug report, despite the rule being directly written into the interface.

리포트에 내용 추가하기

여기에 버그를 재현하거나 당신의 제안을 이해하는 데 관련 있는 내용을 아무것이나 남겨주십시오:

다른 테이블 번호 / 수 번호
새로고침을 해서 문제가 해결 되었습니까?
문제가 얼마나 자주 일어났습니까?
만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

취소 업데이트 보고

#119181: "Sets of eggs miscalculated. Blue player had 2 sets but was given points for 4."

무엇에 대한 보고입니까?

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요

상세한 설명

보고 이력

리포트에 내용 추가하기

보고의 상태를 다음으로 변경:

도움말

기여하기

탐색하기

저희를 팔로우해주세요