• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?

• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

According to lordalx (boardgamearena.com/bug?id=15582):
"When a rematch is proposed, unless game disable it, the player are place around the table in the exact same order (like in real life when you keep on playing with the same game again and again)"

While I understand this logic, I don't think it really applies in BGA turn based games. I'm constantly playing with the same group of friends rematch over rematch of the same game. Some games that we like, we've been "rematching" for over an year. Something like this would never happen "in real life".

Currently, the way rematch works is detrimental to the experience in some games where player position matters a lot (like 7 Wonders, in which you interact only with those players to your side).

I think it would greatly improve BGA if the player order is completely randomized for every rematch. At the very least, for turn based games.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?