• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?

• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

See boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=37045 for details.

I won't go into the details here because of the impossibility to edit for mistakes and the like...

1) It would be nice if the framework allowed game developers to define tournament scoring system(s) specific to each game. Especially for games that do have a IRL tournament scene or for games that simulate sports that have various types of championships....

As an example, a round-robin tournament of football (soccer) could give 3 points per 1 and 1 point per draw

------------------
2) It would be even nicer if game-specific complex tie-breakers could be implemented for tournaments (like using the goal average in a football championship)

---------------
3) Some situations like a "bye" might require a default score to be given for a game that has not been played. It would be nice if game devs could define their own default scores for the game tournaments.
(To go back to the football tournament, giving a "win" is not enough, you might want to also define the number of goals scored for that game. Or maybe not. I'm talking about the freedom for games to define what is best for them)
-----------------------
4) Some games could define multiple scoring systems.

Some systems would only be available in some type of tournaments (like round robin or swiss) and others could be used for all types.

When creating a tournament, the organizer would be able to pick one of the scoring systems available for that game and type of tournament or, of course, use the BGA default one.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?