#154868: "End game quality of life"
무엇에 대한 보고입니까?
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요
그렇다면, 이 보고를 추천해주세요. 추천을 가장 많이 받은 보고부터 우선적으로 처리됩니다!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
상세한 설명
-
• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
-
• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
-
• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
-
• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
-
• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?
-
• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
-
• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
-
• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
-
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
Unless there is some objective that would make you gain less victory points by doing so, the game could do the following automatically at end of game:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Reasoning:
This maximizes money in hand at end of game and money is worth victory points whereas exchange tokens, available workers and current breeding value do not.
Owned workers are worth VP but it doesn't matter where they are so discarding them for money at end of game is a net benefit.
Using exchange tokens gives a chance to draw more workers.
And workers should discarded before using the exchange tokens if using the exchange token lets you reshuffle the deck. The order doesn't matter if no reshuffle is involved so it might as well always be done in that order.
----
The game might also drop a line in the log like "Using tokens and discarding workers to maximize victory points at end of game"
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v132
보고 이력
So it's better to do 2 (as much as possible) then 1. Don't you agree ?
Suppose you have 2 cards left to draw and 2 exchange tokens.
One card left is an engineer and the other a cow.
What you would do at the table IRL, is:
0) Discard all engineer and jokers (actually redundant with step 2 but this is the human thing to do)
1a) exchange : lets suppose you get the engineer first then cow.
2) Discard a cow at random
3) Discard all engineers and jokers (including the one just drawn)
4) Use the second token.
The advantage of this order is that you get a chance to draw again the workers that you just discarded.
If the first exchange gave you the cow first, (1b), the sequence above is still optimal (but in this scenario there is no chance to draw that engineer a second time because it's not in the deck when you shuffle it)
So the optimum is either a loop as described in the report or
1) (optional because redundant with step 3) Discard engineers and jokers
2) "Exchange" as much as you can WITHOUT reshuffling the deck
3) Discard engineers and jokers
4) Use whatever exchange tokens you still have
5) Discard Engineers and jokers
This gives the same result as the loop as long as you don't have so many exchange tokens that you can actually empty your deck twice by using them.
I think the simple loop is easier and gives the same end result:
1) Discard all engineers and joker workers
2) If player still has an exchange token, play 1 exchange token and go back to step one
Choice between options might depends and what (if any) you want to log.
1) "Exchange" as much as you can WITHOUT reshuffling the deck
2) Discard engineers and jokers
3) Use whatever exchange tokens you still have
4) Discard Engineers and jokers
1) Discard engineers and jokers
to:
1) "Exchange" as much as you can WITHOUT reshuffling the deck
2) Discard engineers and jokers
3) Use whatever exchange tokens you still have
4) Discard Engineers and jokers
A lot of players will MAYBE upgrade their score by 1 thanks to you (and they probably do not do that IRL :D)
But we do know what remains in the deck in this implementation.
But anyway whatever can be done is good.
As for having less cattle cards than hand size, well, doesn't that pose a problem anyway ?
Without a special rule, you are drawing cards ad infinitum I think.
I don't think that this add to the problem.
The loop would still work with this I think : discard all relevant workers. Play an exchange that makes you reshuffle and draw all the workers again. Then without a special rule, you have to discard a cow even though you didn't draw one ?
Then discard again, plain another exchange, draw on average half of those workers back depending on when you draw that single cow etc...
The problem with having less cows than your hand size is a problem independent from this really.
But the problem with less cows than the hand size remains. It would say that a player can pick all his worker each turn (so as many times as he have exchange tokens)... well saying that : and then ?
The loop is simple => it is wrong, we were on a 2 iteration loop, we are now in an infinite loop. And i don't like that :D
If designers see it as something that "breaks the game", they might suggest to forbid having less than 5, 6 or 7 cows.
Technically, if you play an exchange token or get a similar effect, you should draw until you get a cow and if you don't get one, you stop when everything is drawn.
Presumably, you then have to discard a cow (assuming you have 1) even if you didn't draw any.
But this mean that you will draw a lot of cards again at end of turn.
One way to limit this a little would be to rule that if you draw everything in search for a cow that you don't actually draw in the end because there isn't any, any further draws during this turn are voided (including or not the replenish at end of turn).
Another way to limit this would be to reduce your max hand size to be at most the number of cows you have or the number of cows -1 or possibly even -2. (this way is effectively a variation to setting a minimum number of cows)
리포트에 내용 추가하기
- 다른 테이블 번호 / 수 번호
- 새로고침을 해서 문제가 해결 되었습니까?
- 문제가 얼마나 자주 일어났습니까?
- 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
