보고 • Board Game Arena

모든 보고

데이브레이크 보고

#169988: "Circular Economy advanced action not working correctly when all emissions have been removed"

notabug: 버그가 아닙니다

무엇에 대한 보고입니까?

데이브레이크 #676486488

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

인터페이스 때문에 룰 상 할 수 있는 특정 행동을 하지 못했습니다

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

인터페이스 때문에 룰 상 할 수 있는 특정 행동을 하지 못했습니다

같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요

그렇다면, 이 보고를 추천해주세요. 추천을 가장 많이 받은 보고부터 우선적으로 처리됩니다!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

상세한 설명

보고 이력

2025년 May 21일 21:23 • MonsterDash • 개발자가 아직 버그를 재현하지 않았습니다:

* F5 did not solve the problem
* Every time

2025년 Aug 16일 21:14 • Kayvon • 버그가 아닙니다:

In general, game rules specify what your *are* allowed to do, rather than listing actions that you are not allowed to perform (outside of clarifying). I've just looked through the rules and don't see anything that suggests you can do just a portion of the card's effect, so I'm going to leave this as is.

2025년 Sep 17일 11:43 • TravaharSummaPowah • 버그가 아닙니다:

Does that mean that if Energy Demand is at zero (admittedly hard to do but not impossible) the code on BGA will prevent us from reducing emissions?

Would it mean that when the box runs out of resilience tokens the cards adding those tokens cannot be triggered either? After all the rules don't specify you're allowed to substitute coins, buttons, etc in as extra tokens.

E.g. would a card like daybreakgame.org/card/1132 become unable to trigger if there were no more energy or infrastructure tokens in the box? Does the BGA version even keep track of how many tokens are in the box?

Looking at other cards and daybreakgame.org/card/1018 (as well as several others) uses the keyword "then" instead of "and" so it doesn't feel like Circular Economy is beholden to the order in which you have to remove the tokens.

I hope my message doesn't come across as crass. It's just that I (and I assume many other players) use BGA's implementation as the standard when it comes to how a game mechanic works) so I feel strongly about making sure the current implementation indeed has it right.

If I come across as too strong then please (a) have my apologies, it's hard to convey tone over the written medium and (b) know that I care very much about this game and love how you've translated it to BGA

2025년 Sep 17일 14:22 • Kayvon • 버그가 아닙니다:

You are not piece limited, so you cannot run out of tokens. This is not the case for all games, but Daybreak isn't intended to run out of tokens. On other games we've implemented, the token limits are strictly tracked. For instance, we receive a bug report for Spots every several months when someone doesn't receive extra treats as a result of the supply running out.

I agree that this case is a wobbler. The cards usually have a cost-reward: discard a card, gain a benefit. It's obvious (to me anyway, but I'm sure you'll agree) that discardig isn't optional. Circular Economy is more of a benefit-benefit, so it seems less harmful to allow players to skip the first benefit. But the implementation is designed to require the first clause before granting the second, otherwise the cost-benefit would break.

I appreciate your approach here. It is indeed hard to tell someone's attitude and many players become very argumentative very easily, but clearly not you.

In this instance, we're inclined to keep the implementation as is. At best, this case is a wobbler and rarely comes up in gameplay.

2025년 Sep 18일 15:22 • TravaharSummaPowah • 버그가 아닙니다:

Thank you for your quick reply.

> It's obvious (to me anyway, but I'm sure you'll agree) that discardig isn't optional

I agree that costs should be paid in full. The rules even go into the edge cases for cards like hydroelectric plants (daybreakgame.org/card/1011) this one cannot be triggered without ecological resilience. The rules are clear: when you must lose a token that you don't have, add a Community in Crisis. So hydro cannot be triggered without resiliience as the player would be chosing.

> In this instance, we're inclined to keep the implementation as is. At best, this case is a wobbler and rarely comes up in gameplay.

I'm glad we can agree that it is a wobbler and I do understand your inclination to keep things as is.

However, I'm playing another game (cause this game is so good and it's well implemented that I'm almost playing it daily) and I think I can wobble it further.

Currently at table=731519571 move =74 with Fossil Fuel Nationalization (daybreakgame.org/card/1044) on my second stack. This card indicates that by discarding, 2 fossil fuel tokens per regulation tag are removed. My stack would thus 12 fossil fuel tokens.

I cannot remove that many tokens (and the game doesn't allow to choose how many cause sometimes triggering this card puts you in energy deficit and you'd wish you could've taken less than the full effect but that's not an option).

Yet the game allows me to trigger this card despite not having 12 dirty energy tokens to remove (and I don't think anyone would argue this card becomes unusable once you exceed the treshold).

I have made a post on BGG. Hopefully one of the designers will weigh in and unwobble things :)

Thanks for reading and thanks for your brilliant implementation of this game

리포트에 내용 추가하기

여기에 버그를 재현하거나 당신의 제안을 이해하는 데 관련 있는 내용을 아무것이나 남겨주십시오:

다른 테이블 번호 / 수 번호
새로고침을 해서 문제가 해결 되었습니까?
문제가 얼마나 자주 일어났습니까?
만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

취소 업데이트 보고

#169988: "Circular Economy advanced action not working correctly when all emissions have been removed"

무엇에 대한 보고입니까?

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요

같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요

상세한 설명

보고 이력

리포트에 내용 추가하기

보고의 상태를 다음으로 변경:

도움말

기여하기

탐색하기

저희를 팔로우해주세요