• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

Per the rules in the book the distress signal should a group choice. However, per the BGA implementation any person can press the distress signal without anyone else having a say in this.
Then once activated, the Captain is given the choice on direction, without input from the group.
This clearly violates the concept of "decide together" which indicates a group choice.

Instead, a better method would be to have a button which players could use to indicate their desire to use the distress signal, that would then be codified by a majority rule, with captain being tie-breaker.

The same concept would be used for deciding the direction, by allowing each player a single vote for Right or Left, or no pass or no preference option, with ties being decided by the Captain.

Alternatively allowing an undo if the group decides they do not want to use to distress signal.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

Pg 12 - 13 English Print Rules:
Distress-Signals for an easier game: "...DECIDE TOGETHER whether you want to make the use of this assistance then turn the distress signal token to its active side..."

"DECIDE TOGETHER if you will pass the cards to the left or right..."

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?