#37708: "Hecate vs heroes"
무엇에 대한 보고입니까?
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요
그렇다면, 이 보고를 추천해주세요. 추천을 가장 많이 받은 보고부터 우선적으로 처리됩니다!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
상세한 설명
-
• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
-
• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오
31 and 48
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io). 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
-
• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?
31 and 48
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
-
• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?
31 and 48
-
• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
-
• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)
31 and 48
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io).
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io). 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
-
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
In this specific game, Polyphemus used its power but since the second dome was build over Hecate, the power was not discarded.
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Google Chrome v89
보고 이력
In cases where the interaction of two powers is too complex for us to code -or- if the interaction is causing confusion for BGA players -or- if we determine the interaction is very unfair, we will add more bans.
Some examples:
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=21093 - too difficult to code
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=29287 - confusing
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=33571 - unfair
I think the official rules don't include *any* bans between normal gods and heroes, because they don't expect you to mix them in the same game (that's for expert players only). For example, the official rules do not ban Circe vs heroes, but this is clearly unfair and must be banned.
Also, the "How to play" page now lists the banned matchups for each power: en.doc.boardgamearena.com/Gamehelpsantorini
For Hecate vs Heroes, I think this can be fixed and am happy to help to reduce Hecate's ban list.
It is still my view that the treatment of hero powers vs God powers is incomplete at best, but mostly they did not consider these interactions at all. Remember, the official rules do not ban Clio vs. any heroes, but they should (it is not fair for Clio to steal a one-time power, use it herself, and discard it... nor is it fair for Clio to steal a one-time power, use it herself, and return it).
The situation with Hecate vs. heroes is the same. There's no fair way to resolve the problem of a partially-cancelled hero turn. Imagine a one-time power related to moving, where the hero's movement is valid but the building is not. It's not fair to cancel only the build portion of the turn and still discard the one-time power about movement (you wouldn't have wasted the one-time ability if you couldn't do the whole turn). Nor is it fair to let them keep the one-time power (since technically it was used). Nor is it fair to just cancel the entire turn. There's no good way to resolve this interaction. The rules here are completely broken. It should reman banned to remain fair.
I must disagree with you. I think Hecate vs Heroes should not be banned. The heroes can still use their power as in a normal game and if well used, it could be very difficult for Hecate to counter (for example, Bellerophon is a clear example of a hero that would be very strong against Hecate). The thing is, as an hero you have to make sure you use your power well. If you suspect Hecate might interrupt your turn, then just don't use your power at all and save it for later. I understand that implementing Hecate vs Heroes could lead to some changes (and that would be perfectly understandable)... But I wouldn't mind to play with an hero against Hecate, I wouldn't feel like I was in disadvantage.
리포트에 내용 추가하기
- 다른 테이블 번호 / 수 번호
- 새로고침을 해서 문제가 해결 되었습니까?
- 문제가 얼마나 자주 일어났습니까?
- 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io).
