• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?

• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

History of Riichi mahjong is complex.
Unlike MCR, there has never been an organization with authority of unifying the rules.
Even in Japan several 'official' pro organizations exist and their rules vary with each other.


Also, this means they have no authority of enforcing their rules over mahjong parlors and amateur club.
Rules more familiar to casual players have many differences from pro rules.
Pro organizations usually operate competitive leagues and modify their own rules to suit the needs.

For example, pro rules do not have bankrupt rules because they use total points system.
Theoretically a player can win the entire league with only winning a single game by an obscene margin.
This hypothetical scenario means rank itself have lesser impact (not 0 because of oka/uma) on the overall performance.
Of course this specific case is improbable, though I hope you get my point :P
Besides, they tend to reduce the weight of luck by forbidding double/triple ron, red 5, abortive draws, and etc. for 'fairer games'.
Some of them even removes uradora or kandora, albeit this variant is minor.

However, that is not the case for jansous (mahjong parlors) and amateur organizations.
They have to attract customers and still run quick games.
Thus they adopted these luck-enhancing red 5 and abortive draws, agari yame and tenpai yame which speeds up the game end, and less-probable but still prizing elements such as double/triple ron, counted yakuman, and multiple yakuman.
Plus, the familiarity also affected the rules they adopt, like nagashi mangan.
(Blessing of Man is an edge case in this matter. Mangan, baiman, 4 fans, yakuman, out of use... :O)

Anyway, variants employed by many jansous and amateur organizations are oriented to platform which entitles the ranks based on a series of individual games, like BGA.
Most of players do not participate competitive tournaments, tens of thousand games run so 'less-probable' stuff eventually happens, and the familiarity.
This is the reason why almost all digital Riichi mahjong implementations use own rules similar to parlor rules, which contradicts rules from competitive organizations.
The default rule set of current implementation is from EMA and it seems quite solid, but adding more popular variant rules as options would make this implementation even better.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?