모든 보고
가이아 프로젝트 보고
#50676: "Add Confirm and/or undo button for all action steps that are able"
#50676: "Add Confirm and/or undo button for all action steps that are able"
rejected: 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다
50676
2
무엇에 대한 보고입니까?
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
제안: 이 기능을 사용하면 아마 게임 구축을 크게 향상시킬 수 있을 것입니다
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
제안: 이 기능을 사용하면 아마 게임 구축을 크게 향상시킬 수 있을 것입니다
같은 내용에 대하여 이미 등록된 보고가 있는지 확인해주세요
그렇다면, 이 보고를 추천해주세요. 추천을 가장 많이 받은 보고부터 우선적으로 처리됩니다!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
상세한 설명
-
• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
-
• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
-
• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
-
• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
-
• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?
-
• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
-
• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
-
• 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
-
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
It can be very frustrating to click accidentally somewhere. Please consider incorporating a confirm or undo button. Thanks for working on this!
• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Safari v14.1
보고 이력
2021년 Oct 14일 21:19 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Thank you for the suggestion. We like the idea of easy undo buttons, but we've decided not to implement this for two reasons:
1) It goes against BGA's undo policy: boardgamearena.com/doc/BGA_Undo_policy
2) Implementing this in a clean way (i.e. a way that doesn't force all players' browsers to reset) is a significant undertaking and the effort doesn't justify the benefit
Sorry, we really would like an easy way to make this happen. It's a frequent requests on all games I've seen.
1) It goes against BGA's undo policy: boardgamearena.com/doc/BGA_Undo_policy
2) Implementing this in a clean way (i.e. a way that doesn't force all players' browsers to reset) is a significant undertaking and the effort doesn't justify the benefit
Sorry, we really would like an easy way to make this happen. It's a frequent requests on all games I've seen.
2021년 Oct 14일 22:31 • GTSchemer • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
@Kayvon which part of BGA's undo policy is this against? I looked at that page but I am confused what you mean.
2021년 Oct 14일 22:31 • Mogri • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
"As a rule of thumb, on BGA we advise you to not undo moves."
2021년 Oct 14일 22:36 • GTSchemer • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
I would also note it says:
'To know if this is a good idea to propose an undo, ask yourself the question: "when playing in real life, will my opponents authorize me to take back this move?". Depending on your answer, you should choose to provide an Undo, to not provide an Undo, or maybe to propose an Undo as an option for the game.'
Similarly, they mention Tzolk'in (a significantly lighter weight game) as an example of "Games with a complex serie of actions are an "exception" to BGA Undo policy."
Lastly, I'll note the guidelines state, 'To conclude: we may allow a player to undo a move caused by a "misclick", but we shouldn't allow a player to undo a bad move he plays consciously.'
Gaia Project already has a very nice undo/confirm for the Convert process, for example -- I am very glad this was implemented.
'To know if this is a good idea to propose an undo, ask yourself the question: "when playing in real life, will my opponents authorize me to take back this move?". Depending on your answer, you should choose to provide an Undo, to not provide an Undo, or maybe to propose an Undo as an option for the game.'
Similarly, they mention Tzolk'in (a significantly lighter weight game) as an example of "Games with a complex serie of actions are an "exception" to BGA Undo policy."
Lastly, I'll note the guidelines state, 'To conclude: we may allow a player to undo a move caused by a "misclick", but we shouldn't allow a player to undo a bad move he plays consciously.'
Gaia Project already has a very nice undo/confirm for the Convert process, for example -- I am very glad this was implemented.
2021년 Oct 14일 22:43 • Mogri • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Similarly, you are asked to confirm or cancel after selecting a planet for a build/upgrade action, selecting planets for a federation, selecting a research track, passing, and so on. What can you accidentally click on without the possibility to change your mind?
Off the top of my head, that list includes things like the Nevlas free action, but I don't think it includes anything that involves the map or board.
Off the top of my head, that list includes things like the Nevlas free action, but I don't think it includes anything that involves the map or board.
2021년 Oct 14일 22:53 • GTSchemer • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
That's a good question! I agree there are confirm prompts at most steps where a misclick might happen.
2021년 Oct 14일 23:12 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
I appreciate your notes on the BGA policy. If that were the only reason, we might be able to make a case for implementing it anyway. With both reasons in place, I'm afraid it's not a viable option for us right now.
Fortunately, confirmations are required at key points to prevent misclicks, which are usually the same points at which real life players would allow you to change your move anyway. ("I didn't mean to put these satellites here... let me rethink those... oh, and take this federation tile instead.")
As mentioned, I understand this is a common request on *many* games.
Fortunately, confirmations are required at key points to prevent misclicks, which are usually the same points at which real life players would allow you to change your move anyway. ("I didn't mean to put these satellites here... let me rethink those... oh, and take this federation tile instead.")
As mentioned, I understand this is a common request on *many* games.
2021년 Nov 14일 11:59 • Ganesha888 • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Terra Mystica does it to the point of the last interaction with other players. Would remove the need to confirm all the single steps, too ;-)
Maybe let us roll back conversions as long as possible (ressources gained that way have not been used, same round)? Actually got me by surprise that it is not possible, since I'm used to it from TM.
Maybe let us roll back conversions as long as possible (ressources gained that way have not been used, same round)? Actually got me by surprise that it is not possible, since I'm used to it from TM.
2021년 Nov 15일 11:24 • VortexSurfer • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
There are many situations where an undo would be useful.
E.g. when charging power due to tech gain, it is not possible to undo in order to do conversions.
I second the suggestion of implementing the undo as in Terra Mystica.
E.g. when charging power due to tech gain, it is not possible to undo in order to do conversions.
I second the suggestion of implementing the undo as in Terra Mystica.
2021년 Nov 16일 21:15 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
BGA's undo policy states:
"As a rule of thumb, on BGA we advise you to not undo moves.
"Undo are painful for opponents, in real world and online. Some players may also use Undo to 'test' situations while they should just think instead.
"In many cases, proposing an 'Undo' means also adding an extra step, which is not good for the game interface."
While we are aware that TM is a similar game, it doesn't override BGA's undo policy. Even if it did, implementing undo isn't simply a copy-paste from their code. The good news it that BGA is pretty open with allowing additions to their code base, so it's possible an industrious fan may come along in the future and add it in.
"As a rule of thumb, on BGA we advise you to not undo moves.
"Undo are painful for opponents, in real world and online. Some players may also use Undo to 'test' situations while they should just think instead.
"In many cases, proposing an 'Undo' means also adding an extra step, which is not good for the game interface."
While we are aware that TM is a similar game, it doesn't override BGA's undo policy. Even if it did, implementing undo isn't simply a copy-paste from their code. The good news it that BGA is pretty open with allowing additions to their code base, so it's possible an industrious fan may come along in the future and add it in.
2021년 Nov 17일 10:30 • Babbuc49 • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
I wanted to add that even if you don’t want to add undo for the whole turn there should at least be a possibility to undo conversions within the same turn (again just like TM) both because misclicks can and will happen and because a last minute change of mind as long as it’s still your turn should be acceptable
2021년 Nov 17일 17:36 • zachhorn117 • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Having to confirm every action you take during a turn isn't great UX, there should be one confirm/undo option at the end of your turn (or before other players charge power from your action like in TM) imho.
I also greatly dislike not being able to undo my conversions during my turn like I can in TM, to echo Babbuc49.
Please, please. please reconsider implementing this at some point. TM wasn't perfect when it first launched on here either, and it took years of feedback and tweaks to get it to where it is now, which is very well regarded.
I can't imagine GP going into Beta then Full release won't create many suggestions for an undo button from users who are used to having that option in TM and other heavier euros on here.
All that being said, thank you so much for getting GP on here lol.
I also greatly dislike not being able to undo my conversions during my turn like I can in TM, to echo Babbuc49.
Please, please. please reconsider implementing this at some point. TM wasn't perfect when it first launched on here either, and it took years of feedback and tweaks to get it to where it is now, which is very well regarded.
I can't imagine GP going into Beta then Full release won't create many suggestions for an undo button from users who are used to having that option in TM and other heavier euros on here.
All that being said, thank you so much for getting GP on here lol.
2021년 Nov 23일 21:12 • Meeplelover • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
If you aren't going to add an undo then please add some commentary for wasted, bad moves. I did a double terraform on a space which only required 1 terraform and could not undo. I also converted 2 green things to workers because I thought I could build 2 mines on 2 planets and could not undo that either
2021년 Nov 25일 13:33 • incredibul • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
As a UX Designer, I heavily disagree with BGAs Undo Policy. Especially in complex games like Gaia Project. The wording "Players need to think" is fair if you finished your move, but if the error did happen while did your move, it's unnecessariliy punishing.
- Games on BGA are originally designed to be played with physical components. There is an error source in a game like Gaia Project that would never happen in real life. Those are small things like picking the wrong Academy or upgrading the wrong building. The player has a visual disconnect between boardstate and question dialogue, especially their own player board. In a physical game, the player would have taken the right piece in the first place. Undo is a good solution to give the player the opportunity to inspect the boardstate that they would much more actively create in a physical game.
- Gaia Project is, especially in the first two rounds, quite punishing if you do something wrong. It can mean that you already know the entire 2-3 hours of playing the game will result in a loss.
- Playing with my gaming group once every week digitally (because of corona), Analysis Paralysis skyrockets for games that have no undo.
- Not offering Undo is a cardinal sin of User Experience Design uxdesign.cc/always-have-a-back-button-4007e124cefa . All the usual reasons for this apply. (In the link, even a real time computer game like DOTA implemented an undo)
- BGA says "Users have to think". But Users should think about awesome strategies or how to improve our world or the multitude of things that happen in their life, not how to make sure they won't commit an error (that usually would not happen in the real game.
- Games on BGA are originally designed to be played with physical components. There is an error source in a game like Gaia Project that would never happen in real life. Those are small things like picking the wrong Academy or upgrading the wrong building. The player has a visual disconnect between boardstate and question dialogue, especially their own player board. In a physical game, the player would have taken the right piece in the first place. Undo is a good solution to give the player the opportunity to inspect the boardstate that they would much more actively create in a physical game.
- Gaia Project is, especially in the first two rounds, quite punishing if you do something wrong. It can mean that you already know the entire 2-3 hours of playing the game will result in a loss.
- Playing with my gaming group once every week digitally (because of corona), Analysis Paralysis skyrockets for games that have no undo.
- Not offering Undo is a cardinal sin of User Experience Design uxdesign.cc/always-have-a-back-button-4007e124cefa . All the usual reasons for this apply. (In the link, even a real time computer game like DOTA implemented an undo)
- BGA says "Users have to think". But Users should think about awesome strategies or how to improve our world or the multitude of things that happen in their life, not how to make sure they won't commit an error (that usually would not happen in the real game.
2021년 Nov 25일 16:11 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Incredibul, have you considered reaching out to BGA about your opinion on their policy? We don't control their policy and, as far as I know, they don't read the individual bug reports.
Their policy is half the reason I'm not implementing undo for Gaia Project. The other half is that I don't want to volunteer 16 hours to implement a feature that I don't feel is needed, though I'm not personally opposed to the idea if industrious fan comes along in the future and adds it in. Like most optional features, having an extra one doesn't really affect me.
Their policy is half the reason I'm not implementing undo for Gaia Project. The other half is that I don't want to volunteer 16 hours to implement a feature that I don't feel is needed, though I'm not personally opposed to the idea if industrious fan comes along in the future and adds it in. Like most optional features, having an extra one doesn't really affect me.
2021년 Nov 25일 18:51 • Deeyo • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Things i have done Mistakenly with 6 games under my belt.
- clicking research station instead of Planetary Institute.
- Misclicking approve conversion button while confirming from phone.
Of course with each game you become more careful. Still it is a long/planning game, even experienced players can do mistakes. It is a pity when game becomes a drag for the person that committed the mistake.
- clicking research station instead of Planetary Institute.
- Misclicking approve conversion button while confirming from phone.
Of course with each game you become more careful. Still it is a long/planning game, even experienced players can do mistakes. It is a pity when game becomes a drag for the person that committed the mistake.
2021년 Nov 28일 00:11 • Diagonal • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Reading the undo policy there appears to be a proviso for exactly the sort of thing you might need to do in Gaia Project "The typical example is a complex strategy game with a long serie of actions during your turn.".
Stuff like converting resources to try and build a 4th research station, or not realising the planet you wanted to build a mine on had just been taken by another player.
The link you provided detailes a relatively simple (but ugly) undo using undoSavePoint, which could even be an optional feature like you say.
Stuff like converting resources to try and build a 4th research station, or not realising the planet you wanted to build a mine on had just been taken by another player.
The link you provided detailes a relatively simple (but ugly) undo using undoSavePoint, which could even be an optional feature like you say.
2021년 Nov 28일 00:32 • Mogri • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Gaia Project is a complex strategy game, but two actions hardly qualifies as a long series.
2021년 Dec 2일 10:03 • Martym • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
A Undo button on conversion would be very helpful as this is a different screen and especially as Conversions are not visible on player board (not until the end of the game)
2021년 Dec 13일 14:20 • Corwin007 • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Agreed. I just converted my last gaiaformer as Baltaks (forgot it was the last), tried to undo, but it's nowhere in site.
2021년 Dec 17일 22:08 • Otis480 • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
I would also appreciate if a possibility to undo moves would be implemented in a similar way than in Terra Mystica. As long as the move-timer is not reset I do not see any problems with undo. After a move is totally confirmed undos should not be allowed, which follows from the boardgamearena policy.
Nevertheless: Thanks so much for implementig one of my all time favourite games on this site :-)
Nevertheless: Thanks so much for implementig one of my all time favourite games on this site :-)
2022년 Feb 27일 09:42 • Diablange74 • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Hi,
Like many players around here, I think an undo button, at least for conversion steps, would be a good idea. It doesn't have any impact on other players turns and fast clicks do happen... Not having an undo button at this step feels like over-punishing, the game is already complex and punishing enough if you take bad decisions, this should not be an additionnal punishment. :)
+1 to the remarks comparing to TM...
Like many players around here, I think an undo button, at least for conversion steps, would be a good idea. It doesn't have any impact on other players turns and fast clicks do happen... Not having an undo button at this step feels like over-punishing, the game is already complex and punishing enough if you take bad decisions, this should not be an additionnal punishment. :)
+1 to the remarks comparing to TM...
2022년 Mar 27일 22:49 • JamTangle • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
A restart turn button exists in so many games on here (Castles of Burgundy off the top of my head). I recently chose upgrade building and selected a Research Station. All fine so far. Then I realised that I could not select the advanced tech tile I wanted because I meant to form a federation first. But it was already too late and I had to select a different tech tile. In a game where resources are meticulously planned out it was a killing blow for me. And something at the table that would have been a quickly and easily rectified. This game needs a restart turn option and I hope that the developers realise this is something possible for their game within BGA and look to implement it in the future.
2022년 Mar 27일 22:53 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
BGA's undo policy states:
"As a rule of thumb, on BGA we advise you to not undo moves.
"Undo are painful for opponents, in real world and online. Some players may also use Undo to 'test' situations while they should just think instead.
"In many cases, proposing an 'Undo' means also adding an extra step, which is not good for the game interface."
I believe this conversation has run its course. I would invite those interested in in changing the policy to comment here instead: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=13887
"As a rule of thumb, on BGA we advise you to not undo moves.
"Undo are painful for opponents, in real world and online. Some players may also use Undo to 'test' situations while they should just think instead.
"In many cases, proposing an 'Undo' means also adding an extra step, which is not good for the game interface."
I believe this conversation has run its course. I would invite those interested in in changing the policy to comment here instead: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=13887
2024년 Jul 22일 23:15 • waxoid • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Thanks to developers for making this adaptation happen!
My group is having a rough go with this BGA game relative to other complex games like Ark Nova which allow an ability to restart a turn as long as you have not done something irreversible like look at a card.
The game has many details that are easy to misunderstand and this BGA adaptation has some unclear UI that is easy to misuse or misread. For example, yes 'convert' asks for confirmation, but it doesn't show you what you are converting, so isn't really helpful.
If you accidentally (say) tap a conversion twice (e.g. unsure if it registered the first given lack of feedback) you have no idea you've just lost your last QIC along with your entire strategy for the remainder of the game (not that this didn't just happen to me.)
Complex games are full of fine print gotchas that in the real world everyone grants mercy over – 'oh you didn't realize you couldn't do that yet, sure then you don't want to waste your X go ahead and take it back and take a different move.'
I assume the comment about "painful for opponents" means in realtime games? Seems like there would be a lot of options for limiting that (including options to just set up realtime games that don't allow resets or undos.)
Do the implementation challenges extend to implementing a single 'restart turn' option? That adds no steps.
I'll comment on the BGA policy thread as well, but just thought I'd point out how well received (and well used) the 'restart turn' option is in Ark Nova, a very popular game on here.
Thanks again for making this possible.
My group is having a rough go with this BGA game relative to other complex games like Ark Nova which allow an ability to restart a turn as long as you have not done something irreversible like look at a card.
The game has many details that are easy to misunderstand and this BGA adaptation has some unclear UI that is easy to misuse or misread. For example, yes 'convert' asks for confirmation, but it doesn't show you what you are converting, so isn't really helpful.
If you accidentally (say) tap a conversion twice (e.g. unsure if it registered the first given lack of feedback) you have no idea you've just lost your last QIC along with your entire strategy for the remainder of the game (not that this didn't just happen to me.)
Complex games are full of fine print gotchas that in the real world everyone grants mercy over – 'oh you didn't realize you couldn't do that yet, sure then you don't want to waste your X go ahead and take it back and take a different move.'
I assume the comment about "painful for opponents" means in realtime games? Seems like there would be a lot of options for limiting that (including options to just set up realtime games that don't allow resets or undos.)
Do the implementation challenges extend to implementing a single 'restart turn' option? That adds no steps.
I'll comment on the BGA policy thread as well, but just thought I'd point out how well received (and well used) the 'restart turn' option is in Ark Nova, a very popular game on here.
Thanks again for making this possible.
2024년 Jul 22일 23:20 • waxoid • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
The latest on the attached thread is that undo is "now part of our [BGA] guidelines for most premium games", so it sounds like the BGA policy has changed.
Is a 'restart turn' option feasible, and less complex than undo of all sub-steps?
Is a 'restart turn' option feasible, and less complex than undo of all sub-steps?
2024년 Jul 22일 23:57 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
> Do the implementation challenges extend to
> implementing a single 'restart turn' option? That
> adds no steps.
Yes, it absolutely includes that. Even if it's easy to describe, it's still difficult to implement (and that's before considering that opponents often make decisions during your turn).
> Is a 'restart turn' option feasible, and less
> complex than undo of all sub-steps?
Again, no. We've already implemented the full amount of what's feasible and less complex.
> just thought I'd point out how well received (and
> well used) the 'restart turn' option is in Ark Nova,
> a very popular game on here.
If the Ark Nova developer also want to volunteer 15 or 20 hours to do that here, have him contact me. Or even if you want to do it. I'VE even done it on other games, but it will not integrate well to the existing design. It comes off like you're saying that someone else did it, so we should be required to volunteer our time to do it, too.
I'm glad you enjoy the game in general, even if it's lacking all the finest bells and whistles.
> implementing a single 'restart turn' option? That
> adds no steps.
Yes, it absolutely includes that. Even if it's easy to describe, it's still difficult to implement (and that's before considering that opponents often make decisions during your turn).
> Is a 'restart turn' option feasible, and less
> complex than undo of all sub-steps?
Again, no. We've already implemented the full amount of what's feasible and less complex.
> just thought I'd point out how well received (and
> well used) the 'restart turn' option is in Ark Nova,
> a very popular game on here.
If the Ark Nova developer also want to volunteer 15 or 20 hours to do that here, have him contact me. Or even if you want to do it. I'VE even done it on other games, but it will not integrate well to the existing design. It comes off like you're saying that someone else did it, so we should be required to volunteer our time to do it, too.
I'm glad you enjoy the game in general, even if it's lacking all the finest bells and whistles.
2024년 Aug 26일 09:30 • Robyn Hood • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
I would like to renew this suggestion, because it seems to me the main point that still can be improved in an almost perfect implementation of Gaia Projet (thanks a lot for that!).
As already written before: misclicks can happen (description of my case here: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188034#p188034 ), and this feature would avoid game ruining consequences.
I think many players around here would be happy if you could reconsider its implementation.
As already written before: misclicks can happen (description of my case here: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=188034#p188034 ), and this feature would avoid game ruining consequences.
I think many players around here would be happy if you could reconsider its implementation.
2024년 Aug 26일 14:49 • Kayvon • 개발자는 이 제안이 좋지 않거나 이점에 비해 너무 많은 노력이 들어간다고 생각합니다:
Robyn, if you are volunteering to implement this, please contact me directly. Otherwise, I believe the conversation has run its course.
리포트에 내용 추가하기
여기에 버그를 재현하거나 당신의 제안을 이해하는 데 관련 있는 내용을 아무것이나 남겨주십시오:
- 다른 테이블 번호 / 수 번호
- 새로고침을 해서 문제가 해결 되었습니까?
- 문제가 얼마나 자주 일어났습니까?
- 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
보고의 상태를 다음으로 변경:
bug?id=50676
