• 만약 오류 메세지가 화면에 나타났다면, 그 오류 메세지를 복사해서 붙여넣어 주시기 바랍니다.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 무엇을 하고 싶었고, 무엇을 했고, 무슨 일이 일어났는지를 설명해 주십시오

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io). 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 막혔을 때 화면에 무엇이 나타났습니까?(검은 화면? 게임 인터페이스? 오류 메시지?)

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어느 규칙이 BGA 서비스에서 존중되지 않았습니까?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 게임 리플레이에서 룰 위반을 확인할 수 있습니까?만약 그렇다면, 몇번째 수에서 룰 위반이 있나요?

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 당신이 하고 싶었던 게임 내 행동이 어느 것입니까?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 이 게임 행동을 하기 위해 무엇을 시도했습니까?

• 당신이 이것을 하려고 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태창 메시지 등)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 어떤 부분에서 문제가 발생 하였나요(문제가 발생했을 당시 어떤 지시가 내려졌었나요)?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 당신이 게임 행동을 하려 했을 때 무슨 일이 일어났습니까?(오류 메시지, 게임 상태 막대 메시지, ...)

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 디스플레이 문제를 설명해주세요. 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io).

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 현재 설정된 언어가 아니라 영어로 표시되는 문장을 복사 후 붙여넣어 주세요. 이 버그(좋은 예시)에 대한 스크린샷이 있으면, 호스팅 서비스의 그림을 업로드하고 링크를 복사/붙이기할 수 있습니다 (예를 들어 snipboard.io). 해당 문장이 번역 본부에서 표시됩니까? 만약 그렇다면, 번역된 지 24시간이 경과했습니까?

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?

• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.

Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436

Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.

1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).

2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.

From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."

Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?

3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.

Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community.

• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?