모든 보고
#74988: "A better tutorial feedback system"
무엇에 대한 보고입니까?
BGA 사이트
무슨 일이 발생했나요? 아래에서 선택하세요
제안: 저는 다음 사항이 이 사이트를 크게 개선할 수 있다고 생각합니다
상세한 설명
• 최대한 쉽게 그 뜻을 이해할 수 있도록 당신의 제안을 정확하고 명료하게 설명해 주십시오.
Game gurus can currently review tutorials in the ALPHA phase (without us having ANY access to their feedback) and only the public can review tutorials in the BETA phase and beyond. Generally the gurus know the game best so it would be good to either:
- Have access to their feedback by having access to their webpage (I've seen the page before)
- Let early testers leave feedback at the end of the tutorial, so tutorial makers can improve their tutorial.
Today I've only had access to what gurus are saying about the tutorial I made recently, but only through a direct message. It would be good to not need to message directly if possible, so comment threads can involve multiple people reviewing.• 브라우저가 무엇입니까?
Mozilla v5
보고 이력
2022년 11월 1일 21:21 • 3p1cFr3nzy • 아직 개발자가 분석하지 않은 제안입니다:
For tutorials, they only get promoted to BETA from the ALPHA stage (which is when the public can see them) after they have been reviewed by multiple people, usually around 10 or so. This can be an exception if the developer gets involved and likes the tutorial. Thus, early feedback is vital for the success of a tutorial.
Here is an example of some feedback I could not see from a guru:
snipboard.io/gXdLqK.jpg
This inability to see feedback from gurus spans across all games, and one can only see their comments if they are a guru themselves. To be honest, being a guru in multiple games just for tutorial making is not worth it at all.
The other suggestion would be similar to reviews you normally find online - someone gives a rating together with a comment. Of course, I would suggest complete anonymity for ratings.
Here is an example of some feedback I could not see from a guru:
snipboard.io/gXdLqK.jpg
This inability to see feedback from gurus spans across all games, and one can only see their comments if they are a guru themselves. To be honest, being a guru in multiple games just for tutorial making is not worth it at all.
The other suggestion would be similar to reviews you normally find online - someone gives a rating together with a comment. Of course, I would suggest complete anonymity for ratings.
2023년 4월 12일 22:33 • nicotacotac • 아직 개발자가 분석하지 않은 제안입니다:
Also, being able to add extra comment to the rating (like for alpha and beta *games* - not tutorial) would be greatly valuable
2024년 1월 1일 19:06 • lefalaf • 아직 개발자가 분석하지 않은 제안입니다:
I second the ability to comment, optionally, alongside the start rating at the end. There have been plenty of times when I wanted to say something, but didn't feel like bugging the creator directly, assuming I remembered their handle by the end. I feel it would be good to allow the comments, but leave them in a bucket separate from normal DMs that the creator can review at once for a tutorial / tutorials.
2025년 3월 22일 11:44 • Thomas • 아직 개발자가 분석하지 않은 제안입니다:
I second this. Giving feedback to single steps would help identify the texts. Allowing feedback to have a status (open, rejected, infoneeded, accepted, fixed, reopened) similar to the bug system even allows to see how good a tutorial is.
리포트에 내용 추가하기
여기에 버그를 재현하거나 당신의 제안을 이해하는 데 관련 있는 내용을 아무것이나 남겨주십시오:
- 다른 테이블 번호 / 수 번호
- 새로고침을 해서 문제가 해결 되었습니까?
- 문제가 얼마나 자주 일어났습니까?
- 만약에 버그에 대한 스크린샷을 가지고 계신다면 Imgur.com 사이트에 업로드 하시고, 여기에 링크를 복사/붙여넣기 하시기 바랍니다.
